Eric, you keep using the term “permissioned” but there is nothing permissioned about Kaspa and being permissioned is not a consequence of social consensus (and if it were, Bitcoin would have also been permissionless by the same argument, as it relies on social consensus for chain…
— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 4, 2025
**Shai Deshe Defends Kaspa’s Permissionless Nature in Twitter Discourse**
In a recent Twitter exchange, Shai Deshe Wyborski, a PhD candidate in quantum cryptography and a core developer of the Kaspa project, engaged in a heated discussion regarding the nature of permissioned versus permissionless blockchain systems. Deshe challenged comments made by Eric, a contributor in the crypto community, who repeatedly referred to Kaspa as “permissioned.”
In his tweet, Deshe pointed out that the term “permissioned” is incorrectly applied to Kaspa, asserting that the blockchain is fundamentally permissionless. He emphasized that being permissioned is not inherently a consequence of social consensus, suggesting that if that were the case, Bitcoin—as a well-known blockchain that operates on social consensus—would also be classified as permissionless. This differentiation is significant as it aligns with the broader ethos of decentralized blockchain technology, which aims to allow unrestricted access and participation in the network.
Deshe’s comments reflect ongoing debates in the cryptocurrency community about the definitions and implications of permissioned versus permissionless systems. As a core developer of Kaspa, Deshe is invested in clarifying misconceptions that may arise within discussions of its architecture and governance.
For those interested in this emerging and rapidly evolving technology, staying updated on discussions and developments is vital. Kaspanews.net is dedicated to providing comprehensive news and resources surrounding Kaspa, ensuring enthusiasts have access to the latest information in the blockchain space.