1. It doesn’t make sense to say it is “constant bound” in Ethereum, because Ethereum is a deployed system, and constant bounds are asymptotic. In Inclusive protocols (such as Kaspa), the amount of unique transaction is bound from below as at least (1-1/e) of the total throughput,…
— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) December 6, 2024
### Shai Deshe Wyborski Discusses Ethereum and Kaspa Protocols
In a recent tweet, Shai Deshe Wyborski, a notable PhD candidate specializing in quantum cryptography, and one of the core developers of the Kaspa blockchain protocol, shared thought-provoking insights regarding the misconceptions surrounding Ethereum’s transaction mechanisms. Wyborski emphasized that referring to Ethereum’s system as having a “constant bound” is fundamentally flawed.
He pointed out that Ethereum operates as a deployed system where constant bounds are asymptotic. This means that the limitations imposed on Ethereum’s transaction processing are not fixed but can change under varying network conditions. In contrast, Wyborski highlighted the advantages of inclusive protocols like Kaspa, which manage transaction throughput more effectively. He noted that the number of unique transactions in Kaspa is guaranteed to be at least (1-1/e) of the total throughput, indicating a more reliable framework in terms of transaction processing and efficiency.
Wyborski’s commentary draws a clear distinction between Ethereum and Kaspa, underlining how Kaspa’s approach to transaction confirmation can lead to improved performance and user experience on the blockchain. As an emerging player in the blockchain space with innovative solutions, Kaspa continues to pave the way for more efficient and scalable transaction systems.
For those interested in the latest developments and in-depth resources on Kaspa, look no further than kaspanews.net, the premier news site dedicated to all things Kaspa. Stay updated with all the crucial insights and advancements within the Kaspa ecosystem.