The Official Kaspa X Profile: https://t.co/HMDANOxZyy— Kaspa (@KaspaCurrency) January 28, 2025
@Kaspa_BTB https://t.co/HMDANOxZyy— Kaspa (@KaspaCurrency) January 28, 2025
Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: So let me get this straight. You post a vitriol about Kaspa that is literally counterfactual, and when I extensively point that out you call it “irrelevant” because you “DidN’T hAVe A ReaSOn tO ReSAerCh FUrtHeR”?!?If you can’t be arsed to read about it, WHY ARE YOU WRITING… https://t.co/otfWPDiCRG— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) January 28, 2025
So let me get this straight. You post a vitriol about Kaspa that is literally counterfactual, and when I extensively point that out you call it “irrelevant” because you “DidN’T hAVe A ReaSOn tO ReSAerCh FUrtHeR”?!?If you can’t be arsed to read about it, WHY ARE YOU WRITING… https://t.co/otfWPDiCRG— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 28, 2025
The Official Kaspa X Profile: 👀PSA! Tune in to hear more about the vision behind the Kaspa film project. https://t.co/X3vuyW8L97— January 28, 2025
👀PSA! Tune in to hear more about the vision behind the Kaspa film project. https://t.co/X3vuyW8L97— Kaspa (@KaspaCurrency) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: “i do k” – Michael Sutton, January 28, 2025
i do k— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: i dk 😉
i dk ;)— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: + it’s wrong to reorganize definitions by invalidating previous jargon. It’s better to introduce new more holistic definitions— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025
+ it’s wrong to reorganize definitions by invalidating previous jargon. It’s better to introduce new more holistic definitions— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: The post is misleading bcs it treats both “corrections” equally. The first correction is indeed factual while the second is just you organizing your thoughts/definitions. I see no reason for a bold statement “x does not generalize y as was claimed” which can be misread— January 28, 2025
The post is misleading bcs it treats both “corrections” equally. The first correction is indeed factual while the second is just you organizing your thoughts/definitions. I see no reason for a bold statement “x does not generalize y as was claimed” which can be misread— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: Btw, in some internal DK writings we have referred to the probabilistic setup as the “oblivious consensus paradigm”. Since nodes run forever, obliviously, and only observers make actual decisions.— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025
Btw, in some internal DK writings we have referred to the probabilistic setup as the “oblivious consensus paradigm”. Since nodes run forever, obliviously, and only observers make actual decisions.— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: You can make new distinctions as you see fit, but point 2 in the post is not justified. Again, that’s my pov.— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025
You can make new distinctions as you see fit, but point 2 in the post is not justified. Again, that’s my pov.— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: “There’s no well defined terminology so no need to make unnecessary corrections imho” – January 28, 2025
There’s no well defined terminology so no need to make unnecessary corrections imho— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: Dunno. To me Nakamoto consensus = Longest/Heaviest chain rule— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025
Dunno. To me Nakamoto consensus = Longest/Heaviest chain rule— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: Once you call it a blockDAG (and not just a DAG), you are talking about crypto. What I am saying is that there were previous attempts to use a DAG structure in blockchain but Kaspa is the first one to do it successfully — January 28, 2025
Once you call it a blockDAG (and not just a DAG), you are talking about crypto. What I am saying is that there were previous attempts to use a DAG structure in blockchain but Kaspa is the first one to do it successfully— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 28, 2025
Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: Two common misconceptions I feel responsible for because of careless phrasing in ancient times1. Kaspa is not the first BlockDAG. Technically speaking, all blockchains are blockDAGs, but if we’re being strict about this and limit the definition of blockDAGs to techs that…— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 January 28, 2025
Two common misconceptions I feel responsible for because of careless phrasing in ancient times1. Kaspa is not the first BlockDAG. Technically speaking, all blockchains are blockDAGs, but if we’re being strict about this and limit the definition of blockDAGs to techs that…— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: To counter attacks, yes. The blue cluster used for this conflict represents the best connected (p2p) *relative* majority. However for things like block rewards, we need a more *dichotomic* global coloring. Current plan (this belongs to “applied DK research”) is to provide an…— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025
To counter attacks, yes. The blue cluster used for this conflict represents the best connected (p2p) *relative* majority. However for things like block rewards, we need a more *dichotomic* global coloring. Current plan (this belongs to “applied DK research”) is to provide an…— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Michael Sutton On X: Btw, this fig/observation is a physicist-side-of-the-brain observation— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025
Btw, this fig/observation is a physicist-side-of-the-brain observation bcc: @hashdag— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025