Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: $kas is an inanimate object that has no goals or visions, like Bitcoin or water or seashells or gold. There are many people in the $kas community who do have aspirations for Kaspa. I for one think it could be the endgame utility chain to rule them all.— January 29, 2025

$kas is an inanimate object that has no goals or visions, like Bitcoin or water or seashells or gold. There are many people in the $kas community who do have aspirations for Kaspa. I for one think it could be the endgame utility chain to rule them all.— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 29, 2025

read more

Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: Types of responses to $kas FUD (and I general) I do not like (even if I sometimes get tempted to some of them myself): – Making fun of the way people look/sound – Comparison tables – Unsolicited psychoanalysis – Unsolicited medical diagnosis – Posting charts of other coins… January 29, 2025

Types of responses to $kas FUD (and I general) I do not like (even if I sometimes get tempted to some of them myself): – Making fun of the way people look/sound – Comparison tables – Unsolicited psychoanalysis – Unsolicited medical diagnosis – Posting charts of other coins…— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 29, 2025

read more

Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: So let me get this straight. You post a vitriol about Kaspa that is literally counterfactual, and when I extensively point that out you call it “irrelevant” because you “DidN’T hAVe A ReaSOn tO ReSAerCh FUrtHeR”?!?If you can’t be arsed to read about it, WHY ARE YOU WRITING… https://t.co/otfWPDiCRG— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) January 28, 2025

So let me get this straight. You post a vitriol about Kaspa that is literally counterfactual, and when I extensively point that out you call it “irrelevant” because you “DidN’T hAVe A ReaSOn tO ReSAerCh FUrtHeR”?!?If you can’t be arsed to read about it, WHY ARE YOU WRITING… https://t.co/otfWPDiCRG— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) January 28, 2025

read more

Michael Sutton On X: The post is misleading bcs it treats both “corrections” equally. The first correction is indeed factual while the second is just you organizing your thoughts/definitions. I see no reason for a bold statement “x does not generalize y as was claimed” which can be misread— January 28, 2025

The post is misleading bcs it treats both “corrections” equally. The first correction is indeed factual while the second is just you organizing your thoughts/definitions. I see no reason for a bold statement “x does not generalize y as was claimed” which can be misread— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025

read more

Michael Sutton On X: Btw, in some internal DK writings we have referred to the probabilistic setup as the “oblivious consensus paradigm”. Since nodes run forever, obliviously, and only observers make actual decisions.— Michael Sutton January 28, 2025

Btw, in some internal DK writings we have referred to the probabilistic setup as the “oblivious consensus paradigm”. Since nodes run forever, obliviously, and only observers make actual decisions.— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) January 28, 2025

read more