**e-tps Unveiled: Simplifying Tech Jargon with AI**
This is just amazing. I was too lazy to write the full explanation of what e-tps is, but nowadays all it takes is asking deepwiki the right question@fishtunahttps://t.co/O5nlAredaj https://t.co/yX394v4tP6— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025
cf this post https://t.co/UfWvrsRf8z— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025 Michael Sutton shares insights on financial trends
cf this post https://t.co/UfWvrsRf8z— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025
**Ultimate Sequencer Goals: Solana-like ZK, Ethereum-Scalable** “details aside, the ultimate sequencer should resemble more a zk enshrined version of solana than a scalable version of ethereum”~ @hashdag, https://t.co/U6bKyJZ7qP (this goal stated above ^ is what we are trying to achieve/design these days; it’s why we are putting so much… https://t.co/SPuPJwSW9M— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025
“details aside, the ultimate sequencer should resemble more a zk enshrined version of solana than a scalable version of ethereum”~ @hashdag, https://t.co/U6bKyJZ7qP (this goal stated above ^ is what we are trying to achieve/design these days; it’s why we are putting so much… https://t.co/SPuPJwSW9M— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025
**Michael Sutton Discusses Atomic Composability in ZK Dapps**
We are aware and on to this challenge way more than you probably think. The whole motivation for atomic composability is to provide the user with a flat experience of zk dapps interacting w/o restrictions. So while there will be various zk/vm infras and prover networks behind the…— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 25, 2025
**L1 Centralization and Diverse Tech Stacks: Rethinking Core Role** **Put differently:** L1’s shift towards centralization through excessive computational load challenges its consensus role. **Another point:** Favoring L1 as a tech platform risks deviating from its sequential event consensus essence.
Put differently + another point:(i) L1 deviating from its core role of reaching consensus on a sequence of events in favor of (conceptually) unbounded computational burden (=centralization); and (ii) architectural preference of having L1 as a platform/protocol layer with diverse tech stacks built over it
**Exploring the Future of Smart Contracts: Native On-DAG Implementation with ZK Tech**
So many tradeoffs, nuances, and complexities, so why not ditch it all and just implement native smart contracts on-dag?The gist: I believe zk tech provides a leap in the ability of replicated state machines to scale computationally. So any sc sys without zk is inferior https://t.co/EIHXNg0lYr— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 24, 2025
Kaspa’s Bull Run: Analyst Sets ‘Realistic’ Price Target
With the price of Kaspa bouncing around $0.11, how high can it still go this bull run? An analyst from the Altcoin Doctor YouTube channel addressed this exact question and outlined what he considers a “realistic” Kaspa price target for the current cycle. The video blends macro signals with technical tools like Fibonacci levels to […]
The post Top Analyst Points to…
“Is Kaspa Set to Hit $10? Experts Weigh In on 2030 Prospects”
Kaspa price is believed to have a lot more to offer, but how high can it go? A new video from Money and I addresses this and the possibility of KAS price reaching $10 by 2030. “So, will Kaspa reach $10 by 2030 and make you richer than you ever thought possible? There are definitely […]
The post Can Kaspa (KAS) Reach…
Analyst Highlights Key Coins to Watch Ahead of Bitcoin’s All-Time High and Potential Altcoin Rally
Bitcoin’s new ATH sets FloppyPepe (FPPE) on full blast to lead Pepe (PEPE) and Kaspa (KAS) in the coming altcoin rally.
Kaspa’s Supply Slashes to Lowest Ever: Price Analysis
Kaspa (KAS) is almost always in the spotlight, but this time it’s because of on-chain scarcity and technical strength.. With just 0.78% of the circulating supply moving in the past 24 hours, daily active supply is approaching record lows, setting the stage for what many are calling a looming supply shock. Supply Shock Brewing: What […]
The post Kaspa’s Circulating Supply Just…
### Post News Title: – **Exploring Atomic Composability and ZK Rollups**
I find this post to be an accumulation of the clarity we are starting to obtain in the last few weeks regarding atomic composability and synchronous interop between based ZK rollups, and I hope the reader benefits from it in the same way. There’s a lot to follow..Yes, this…— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 22, 2025
**Centralization Risks in Proof-of-Inclusion Validation Systems**
Along the way, we show that inclusion-time proving actually means censorship is delegated to the provers (who can avoid providing proof and thus censor the transaction from inclusion in the first place). This means prover services become subject to centralization concerns, unlike…— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 22, 2025
**Separating Proof and Transaction Data for Blockchain Efficiency**
This motivates the need for separating proof data availability from transaction data availability (i.e., transaction inclusion) and for time-bounding the period in which such proofs must be submitted for composable multi-logiczone transactions— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 22, 2025
**Post News Title:** “Inclusion-Time Proving Challenges Multileader Consensus in Blockchain Systems”
However, the post shows that inclusion-time proving is not only hard to achieve performance-wise (especially considering that in some systems, inclusion-time/realtime is actually much less than eth’s 12-second block time), but rather fundamentally contradicts the idea of multileader consensus. Multileader consensus introduces parallelism, leading to inclusion-time execution uncertainty, thus preventing the attachment of an inline proof
**Inclusion-Time Proofs: Revolutionizing ZK Collaborative Proofs**
At first glance, inclusion-time proving seems crucial for enabling atomic composability between multiple based zk rollups/logic-zones. It solves the dependency problem in one shot: we either all collaborate to create a collective proof—attached directly to the transaction—or we…— Michael Sutton (@michaelsuttonil) May 22, 2025