Michael Sutton On X: Of course there are hardware limits, but hardware can vary so it’s not a fixed number but rather a tradeoff. Theoretic limits can be calculated as well but I believe they are in much higher regions (>>100). I’ll need to do some back of the envelope calculations for a more…— Michael Sutton November 27, 2024

Nov 27, 2024 |

Of course there are hardware limits, but hardware can vary so it’s not a fixed number but rather a tradeoff. Theoretic limits can be calculated as well but I believe they are in much higher regions (>>100). I’ll need to do some back of the envelope calculations for a more…— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) November 27, 2024

read more

Michael Sutton On X: I don’t know (currently) of any good reasons to go beyond ~100. All competition arguments (MEV, Oracles) should get sufficient competition at 100. Service providers or dedicated apps can perform nicely with 1% hashrate (exclusive 1bps). Also I want to refer to another…— November 27, 2024

Nov 27, 2024 |

I don’t know (currently) of any good reasons to go beyond ~100. All competition arguments (MEV, Oracles) should get sufficient competition at 100. Service providers or dedicated apps can perform nicely with 1% hashrate (exclusive 1bps). Also I want to refer to another…— Michael Sutton (@MichaelSuttonIL) November 27, 2024

read more

Shai (Deshe) Wyborski On X: It does not. BFT could never compete with PoW in terms of security, validation efficiency, decentralization etc. This has nothing to do with Kaspa and Qubic in particular.What makes it “boring” is that it is no different than any other quorum based BFT. It just doesn’t innovate… November 26, 2024

Nov 26, 2024 |

It does not. BFT could never compete with PoW in terms of security, validation efficiency, decentralization etc. This has nothing to do with Kaspa and Qubic in particular.What makes it “boring” is that it is no different than any other quorum based BFT. It just doesn’t innovate…— Shai ❤️ Deshe 💜 Wybors𐤊i 💙 (大胡子) (@DesheShai) November 26, 2024

read more