Kaspa Currency Responds to Community Concerns and Rethinks Operations
Introduction
In a significant move to address community feedback, Kaspa (@KaspaCurrency) has publicly acknowledged the need for structural changes in the operation of its platform. This response comes after various concerns were raised by its community members regarding its operation and communication strategies.
The Concerns
Hello World,
We* (@’s in reply) were asked to rethink how @KaspaCurrency operates and respond to some concerns: (i) it looked official, (ii) it spoke with one face and voice, not always aligned with core devs, (iii) it had more influence than most, (iv) it acted like a…
— Kaspa (@KaspaCurrency) May 31, 2025
The tweet from KaspaCurrency highlights four major concerns:
- Official Appearance: The platform appeared too official, leading to perceptions of it being an authoritative voice rather than a community-driven initiative.
- Lack of Diverse Voices: Often, the communications were not aligned with the views of core developers or other significant contributors.
- Influence: KaspaCurrency had more influence in the community than most, which raised worries about centralization of power.
- Operational Autonomy: It operated autonomously, almost like a separate entity, which did not sit well with the ethos of decentralized systems.
Community Response
The reaction from the community on Twitter was swift and varied:
- Support for Change: Many users expressed appreciation for KaspaCurrency’s willingness to revisit its operational structure. A reply from @CryptoPhil mentioned, “Great to see @KaspaCurrency responding to community feedback. Decentralization starts with listening.”
- Skepticism: Some were skeptical about the real changes that might come from this acknowledgment. @BitcoinBull coined, “Have seen these statements before, all talk and no walk.”
- Proposals for Action: Several users suggested ways Kaspa could involve the community more directly, like @Erin_ETH who proposed, “Set up a governance DAO to truly distribute the decision-making process.”
- Expectations: There was an overarching expectation from the community for more transparency and inclusivity, with @LunaCrypto stating, “We need all voices, especially those from the core teams.”
Looking Forward
KaspaCurrency’s next steps remain to be seen, but the initial statement has already sparked a broader discussion on how decentralized projects should manage communication and governance:
- Community Involvement: More community members could be involved in decision-making processes to ensure diverse viewpoints.
- Transparent Communication: Regular updates aligning with core developers and the broader community’s input.
- Governance Models: Exploring models like DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) to distribute influence and power more evenly.
This development is a pivotal moment for KaspaCurrency, potentially setting a precedent for how digital currencies and blockchain projects handle community relations and governance in response to public feedback.