The discussion about which blockchain truly champions decentralization has been reignited by a recent analysis from Kaspa Daily. Here’s a closer look at what the numbers reveal about Ethereum and Kaspa’s distribution of tokens and what it might mean for the future of both networks.

Distribution Dynamics

A tweet from Kaspa Daily threw light on Ethereum’s concentration of wealth, where the top 9 entities hold over 19% of all ETH, excluding the significant Beacon Chain deposit contract:

Decentralization in Numbers: Ethereum vs. Kaspa

Ethereum top 9 entities (including exchanges, wrapped tokens, and bridges) control over 19% of the total ETH supply, that’s excluding the Beacon Chain deposit contract.

In comparison, Kaspa top 10 holders control around 16.9% of… pic.twitter.com/J3JnWOYxY7

— Kaspa Daily (@DailyKaspa) June 24, 2025

In contrast, Kaspa’s top 10 holders only hold about 16.9% of the total KAS supply. This might suggest a more decentralized network at first glance, but there are nuances to consider.

Ethereum’s Ecosystem and Maturity

Ethereum’s lead in the blockchain ecosystem is not unfounded. Despite its token distribution looking more centralized, several factors contribute to its status:

• Maturity: Ethereum has been in the game for much longer, developing a robust ecosystem.
• Utility: From smart contracts to DeFi, NFTs, and DAOs, Ethereum’s ecosystem is vast and complex, driving its value and complexity.
• Reliance on Centralized Services: The involvement of custodial wallets, liquid staking platforms, and bridges naturally leads to some concentration of wealth.

Kaspa’s Current and Future State

Kaspa currently presents a simpler model, focusing on blockDAG (block Directed Acyclic Graph) technology rather than extensive feature sets. Here’s why:

• Lean Design: Without the features like staking or smart contracts, Kaspa’s distribution appears cleaner but less functional.
• Future Development: As Kaspa potentially introduces smart contracts, DeFi, and Layer 2 scaling solutions, it could face similar centralization pressures.

The Decentralization Dilemma

As projects grow, finding the balance between decentralization and usability remains a significant challenge:

“Ethereum might not score high on the decentralization metric, but its experience through market cycles, security enhancement, and scalability upgrades show resilience,” notes crypto analyst James Brown.

Looking Ahead

While Ethereum has demonstrated its resilience, Kaspa’s initial distribution offers hope for maintaining decentralization. The coming years will be critical as Kaspa scales up:

• Scalability and Decentralization: Can Kaspa keep its decentralized ethos as it adds complexity?
• Ecosystem Development: How will Kaspa’s growth compare to Ethereum’s established network?

Ultimately, while numbers might favor Kaspa in the decentralization debate today, Ethereum’s broad utility, infrastructure, and historical performance ensure it remains a formidable player. The evolution of both networks will be fascinating to observe as the crypto landscape continually evolve.

For more insights and daily crypto updates, subscribe to our new YouTube channel!